Earlier, the bench of Justice Dipak Misra, Justice R. Banumathi and Justice Ashok Bhushan had reserved its verdict on the plea as it involved important questions of law and the interpretation of the constitution.
Today, the Supreme Court has shifted the Sabarimala case to the Constitution Bench after apex court judges raised several questions.
The reason for the ban on entry of women aged between 10 and 50 years as stated by the management of the Sabarimala temple, located on a hilltop in the Western Ghats of Pathanamthitta district was because they can not maintain "purity" on account of menstruation.
India's retail inflation static at 3.28% in September
The Central Statistics Office (CSO) also revised downwards the August inflation to 3.28 per cent from 3.36 per cent. The August intermediate goods output is at -0.2 per cent, against -1.8 per cent in July.
"I hope it [SC] will allow women to enter the temple".
The Supreme Court will declare its decision on the long-existing ban on entry of women. Otherwise, we can not say it [India] is secular country. The Constitution Bench will decide whether Ayyappa devotees frame a different religious category by themselves. According to them, banning the entry of women would be against the basic tenets of Hinduism.
Women's rights activists have high hopes from the apex court.
Questioning the age-old custom, the Supreme Court in July had said, "A temple is a public religious place and can not refuse entry to a woman".
US Announces Withdrawal from UNESCO, Accusing UN Agency of "Anti-Israel" Bias
Under the Reagan Administration, the United States quit UNESCO in 1984, at the time accusing the agency of a pro- Soviet Union bias.
Whether Ayyappa Temple has a denominational character and, if so, is it permissible on the part of a "religious denomination" managed by a statutory board and financed under Article 290-A of the Constitution of India out of Consolidated Fund of Kerala and Tamil Nadu can indulge in such practices violating constitutional principles/ morality embedded in Articles 14, 15 (3), 39 (a) and 51-A (e)?
The larger Bench will choose whether the restriction on ladies to enter the sanctuary qualifies as a "essential religious practice" of the Hindu faith over which the summit court has no ward. It violates the rights of women.
The temple authorities have justified the restriction ladies within the 10-50 age group, saying it is a firm practice established in convention.
Next Years iPad Pro To Come With Face ID
Analysts have been claiming that a lot of people will upgrade to the iPhone X and it has been referred as a super cycle. In fact, Kuo thinks it'll take up to 2.5 years for Android smartphone makers to catch up.